1. This work has not previously been published.
2. To ensure the integrity of the blind review process, I have eliminated all self-identifications in my paper. I understand that these could be restored after the completion of the review process.
3. Each named co-author of our multi-authored submission is an authentic contributor to the work being submitted and has endorsed this work.(N.A = not applicable)
4. I have used the APA referencing style for my article and appropriate players for my audio and video embedment.
5. I have obtained and appended release letters and permissions for all borrowed materials in my submission.
6. I have read the submission guidelines published on the journal website and accept its terms.
1. they are not within the scope of the journal.
2. their content, grammar and structure are woefully substandard.
3. they duplicate a previous publication
4. the same work is under consideration by another journal
5. they are far too long or inappropriately formatted
6. they do not contribute anything to research - repeating what has been published elsewhere, or about to be published, including by this journal.
7. submission guideline has not been followed
Editorial Screening

The editor may reject submissions (or when appropriate return them for revision and resubmission) without them going through peer review if:
Check List     [MsWord ] [PDF] Download
The following checklist should be completed )check off the numbers and included with submissions
Authors are also encouraged to take a look at our Review Instrument (MsWord & pdf) to familiarise themselves with the evaluation criteria that we use to decide on accepting or rejecting their submissions.
Review of Higher Education in Africa
http://www.spreadcorp.org/reviewHigherEdAfric/index.html
ISSN   1916 7881
©2007-2010 Sustainable Programs for Reducing 
Educational and Avocational Disadvantage
[About RHEA] [Editorial Board] [Editorial Policy] [Guidelines] [Author Check List] [Right-to-copy]
[Journal Home]
Review of Higher Education in Africa